Partylist Representative Teddy Casiño already fired the first shot against the furthering of making our poverty-stricken country the milking cow of the greedy cold-blooded politicians.
But instead of hearing the siren roaring down the halls of Congress and seeing collective volleys of fire hurled against the aggressor, there were the usual confused and disjointed litanies of justifications that ranges from sheer arrogance to keeping their lips sealed until the issue would just die down a natural death when Madam Auring’s sex scandal surfaces. Or paper bags with taxpayers’ money on it are once again handed out to their wide open arms plus the lazy script that they are all set to act in front of the probing public.
Casiño proposed that each Congressmen are to receive P1 on their allocated Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) or “pork barrel” as to slam Sorsogon Representative Jose Solis’ proposal to increase the PDAF of each lawmaker by P30 million from its current standing of P70 million.
This pompous proposal of Congressman Solis came even after the scandalous trip of the Palace with all its lapdogs to the United States, spending millions of pesos from taxpayers’ money on expensive dinners to bare-face flaunt their unmoderated thirst for the good life despite the 3 million Filipino families who have nothing to eat everyday.
Adding insult to injury huh. Seems they have come to love the phrase too much.
Everyone knows this “pork barrel” has been one of the main sources of corruption on this country; a very fertile source of wealth in the middle of wasteland. A politician’s oasis when thrust into the deep scorching desert of Sahara.
I think it is already high time for the “pork barrel” of our most beloved and respectable Congressmen to be scrapped out, reconsidered and evaluated with the end-view of the public’s welfare for the following hopefully not-so-lame personal reasons and stop the bleeding of this nation from the carnage of all these wolves and hyenas:
1. The “pork barrel” of congressmen is totally under the control and discretion of the occupant of the Palace. With such very stupid system in place, the President has all the powers under her little baton to manipulate, control, lobby and even blackmail congressmen on key issues involving her office.
Time travel: Are the impeachment cases against GMA still fresh on your mind? Hmm.
Remember: Among Ed Panlilio, the priest-turned-governor of Pampanga spoiled the beans by crying out in the open the giving out of paper bags at the Palace with whooping P200-P500 thousand cash in it to congressmen and local officials during the heated discussions whether the Lower House of Congress should endorse the impeachment case against the President to the excited and vengeful Senate. Huh! To make the story short, all the impeachment cases filed against GMA every year where thrown out into the trash bin with the verdict: the case is valid in form but not in substance! WTF! And the Congressmen? They partied and lived the good life.
All those congressmen who chose to be lapdogs of the Palace were obviously rewarded with expensive dog food and first-class grooming, while all those who bravely continue to scorch our vicious President content themselves with bread crumbs falling from the dinning table of the impoverished public.
Those who traded their souls for easy cash were given lots of infrastructure projects on their provinces approved by the President through their “pork barrel” while opposition congressmen has not received any of the allotted budget to them. Indeed ingenious eh? Pay back time to enemies, is the name of the game; follow me or political and material poverty is the only rule.
In the same way, Congressmen can always threaten a government agency in order for it to get what it wants especially during budget deliberations.
Casiño said, “The threat of one-peso budget has always been used by Congress to get what it wants from an agency. Perhaps it is time congressmen get a taste of their own medicine.â€Â Bravo, bravo! But lemme also think…
2. Having all these projects awarded to congressmen through their “pork barrel” mislead them and people to what they should have been doing as legislators. That is to make laws, amend laws, and more laws…and not to sponsor the making of roads, buildings, schools, basketball games, beauty pageants, baptism of constituents, derby, etc up to the point of begging and kneeling in front of the illegitimate President. These stuffs take most of their time from sitting on committee meetings and deliberations, actively participating on plenary discussions and debates and passing crucial resolutions that the country needs. Most of the time, many important and crucial laws are pending on Congress for so many years because of the lame excuse that they cannot wrestle a quorum. Because many are always absent!
3. Congressmen having a “pork barrel” tucked on their numerous responsibilities gives false hopes and a blurred understanding of who they really are and what they should be doing as public servants to their constituents. Most often than not, constituents are expecting visible signs from their congressmen that he/she is really working like a dog by seeing constructions here and there with the caption: Construction Of 2 million kilometers of road leading to nowhere…By: The Corrupt Illegitimate President and Congressman Lapdog of the Palace.
Their measure of accomplishment is most of the time by things the eye could see. And unfortunately, when a congressman has not constructed anything on his province because of his anti-administration stance, he could easily be not elected anymore come next polls. This political consciousness of most people is not only erroneous but also built on a sandy ground.
It could be either way: the system of politics permits and cultivate such kind of thinking among the people or the people’s thinking and expectations are the ones pushing the government to recourse to such weak and corrupt political governance.
Either way, it is not the work of congressmen. “Let’s allocate one peso for the pork barrel and let the various nominated projects of congressmen undergo line item budgeting and the public scrutiny it deserves,†said the Partylist Representative. Exactly! It is the work of the local government units to build all these stuffs for their constituents. And a better option is to put into the LGUs some of those “pork barrel” allocations that goes through the scrutiny of public, so that our most revered congressmen could alas do their work. (crossing fingers)
4. And the most obvious. It will end or at least lessen opportunities of corruption among the ranks of the congressmen. Each project under their “pork barrel” is usually padded and bloated for them to get commissions. This should stop. Heard me, stop! It may be sounding some tall order but for me I would not settle for seeing infrastructure works here and there courtesy of our congressmen well in fact we all know that they got a good paycheck on each of those same projects. I don’t want to be shortchanged. I want my 100% ROI from the heavy burden of paying my tax dutifully.
Let us see if many politicians would be still over eager to get a seat at the Lower House of Congress.
Should I sing hallelujah? I think such this call is a breath of fresh air to our political system from time to time. A P1 pork barrel may not be imposed for obvious reasons, but at least this is somewhat a voice crying in the desert for our government leaders to straighten up; and from the public to be always aware of “our government’s” actions that certainly would affect us.
Do you agree with Representative Teddy Casiño proposing a P1 “pork barrel” for our congressmen? What are maybe other reasons why the “pork barrel” given to our representatives be reduced significantly or just be totally scrapped out? Oh, I need some pill.
Image by HikingArtist.Com





I have nothing against Teddy Casino. But I think he went overboard by saying that pork barrel should be dropped to P1. It is easy for Teddy to say that as he has no territorial constituents. It would be unfair for those who use their pork barrels for the benefit of their constituents. Take our representative for instance. In spite of the fact that her face is in every corner of our district, I don’t take offense. Why? Because I know that she is doing something and I know where her pork barrel is going to. After all, her projects needs publication as a notice so her face is just a minor externality.
I hope Teddy’s call was a mere spur-of-the-moment-I-am-a-hero kind of call. I trust Teddy’s judgment. More than anybody else, I know he knows for a fact that a multitude of people rely HEAVILY on the pork barrels of their respective congressmen, honest or otherwise.
Who do you think initiate the repairs of roads in the provinces? DPWH? NO! In fact, these were subsidized, if not spent wholly for, by pork barrels. I know corruption remains an issue but if not for the pork barrels, there won’t be infrastructures for public good considering that we have a mixed (but market leaning) economy.
Teddy should consider again that unlike him, almost all of the congressmen have territorial and jurisdictional constituents to serve.
Just a thought. If Teddy were a territorial and jurisdictional representative, do you think he would be willing to forgo of his pork barrel knowing that his constituents rely on that? Definitely not! Again, I have nothing against Teddy nor his principles. It is just that I think he forgot that unlike him, almost all congressmen have territorial constituents.
pinoygossipboy´s last blog ..Love Online (LOL) showing today
Peace bro! Hehehhe! Don’t worry, I am not pissed off whenever you are commenting here on my posts with sometimes a total opposite of my views. It is the beauty of having the comment form; diversity in views, opinions and perspectives that nourish the discussions on issues, that hopefully in the end will bring forth a better understanding of perennial problems…
I agree on that one yo pointed out. Indeed Teddy has no district where people tend to ask everything from their politicians. And politicians especially congressmen are also moved to do something or put up projects in order for their constituent to see that he is not one lazy public servant.
However, this is not the kind of politics that empower people. It is the kind of politics that is like a dole-out system. It should be empowering rather.
Though I may see infrastructures here and there, I would not still be content just to see these stuffs for I know that these projects serve as the milking cow of politicians. The more projects, more commissions and kickbacks. It is like saying maybe that it is just ok for me particularly to put up roads worth 20million pesos on our province with almost 5 million going to the pockets of only a few politicians and those with interest. That is shortchanging the worth, intelligence and labor of taxpayers. That is not empowering I think, that is our usual expression, “oks lang yun, at least may ginagawa.”
I think the pork barrel coult still stay being conscious of some of your arguments. But we could I think put up stricter systems on these funds that is devoid of being used by some people for example the president to lobby on her interest; systems that could eliminate corruption from this big government fund; and systems that would push our congressmen to work and be on the session hall.
Just today, one month has already passed since the opening of the session in the lower house, but nothing has happened according to congressmen coz they can’t muster a quorum; congressmen are all in their provinces busy with preparing for the next elections (at which this pork barrel, could easily be used for campaign fund); and so proposed laws are still pending.
There are also so a number of opposition congressmen and lawmakers who expressed that they have not received their pork barrel because the office of the president does not want to release them; due to their being on the opposition side. I think there is some morsel of truth in it.
Thanks alot Aaron for always making the discussion full of different views. Now I got your real name, ehehehe!
I forgot to answer one point re: LGUs. It is of important notice that some projects are of national significance and are beyond the jurisdiction of the Local Government. (Refer to Local Government Code of 1991). That’s all. Peace tayong lahat.
pinoygossipboy´s last blog ..Love Online (LOL) showing today
Thanks for sharing that note bro…Peace Yo! Wahahhaa!
Try adding another LF/CR (press the enter key) after each paragraph. Even if it LOOKS like one’s already there.
Holly Jahangiri´s last blog ..Amazing Sand Animation
Hi Holly! Thanks for coming over to send some rescue. I was to dial 911 already, good thing I remembered that it is all in the US.
Anyhow, I tried to open the post on its html form and put some break codes on between paragraphs…and now, looks better, eheheh!
Morale of the story: Don’t get panicky, eheheh!
LOL – exactly. Always glad to help, Elmot! It looks great now.
Holly Jahangiri´s last blog ..Beastly! Ghastly!
Yeah, looks better now. What I am very much concerned about is when I make a new post and all those trouble I had would again surface. That is a headache for me.
I am much concern with her suggestion. you should try, it will help you.
Thanks for the concern. I places some html codes on my post’s html tab and seems great.
Hopefully all those troubles would just go away now.
This is hot, bro! I emailed you regarding the link ha? Stay cool, man.

Luke´s last blog ..Hacker | Cracker
Don’t worry bro, I am all cool… Hehehhe! I am just pretty excited in here.
Yeah got the email already…I think it is all good, no problem wether big G penalized your or something.
Thanks by the way.
I say, let’s scrap the “pork barrel” altogether. A representative’s mandate is to represent his/her constituents’ interest in Congress, create and update laws, and stand as oversight on the Executive; and not make “projects” like construction of infrastructures etc.
“Pork barrel” is not only a primary source of corruption, it is a source of patronage politics which is one of the biggest hurdles in our country’s progress.
Jhay´s last blog ..Canon PowerShot SD980 IS – first PowerShot with touchscreen LCD
I totally agree bro. Well said, well said.
Corruption and patronage politics are so sickening. I would not content of seeing infrastructures being mounted here and there knowing that such projects are padded with 10-20% over the price or even higher…and politicians are feasting on these. It is condoning the existence of corruption by saying ” ok lang un, at least may project”.
Sorry but politics is not my forte so I can’t really contribute to this post except say that we need to elect politicians who are honest and not greedy and who will really serve the people and their constituents. But then, its hard to find those types of politicians these days, kinda like an endangered species.
Jaypee´s last blog ..Threadless Tshirt Giveaway
Thanks Jayps for still participating in the discussion despite of your being so fond and familiar with political stuffs.
I really appreciate when there are social and political issues and bloggers and even visitors who are not really into such stuffs join in the discussion.
Yes, I was even thinking last night if good and upright leaders are becoming more and more endangered? Hmmm…
P1 for pork barrel? I would say DREAM ON. Definitely, many politicians would disagree with this.
Tyrone | Millionaire Acts´s last blog ..Term Life Insurance vs. Whole Life Insurance
I say too, DREAM ON!
Many politicians would then rather go back to being businessmen than braving their way to a not so financially rewarding political arena.